Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare, helping with everything from diagnosing diseases to streamlining insurance processes. However, not all AI applications are flawless.
United Healthcare, one of the largest health insurers in the U.S., has faced scrutiny over its use of an AI model with a reported 90% error rate in denying care. This article explores the issue, its impact, and what it means for patients and the healthcare industry.
What Is United Healthcare’s AI Model?
United Healthcare uses AI to assist with decisions about approving or denying care under Medicare Advantage plans. The AI tool, known as nH Predict, analyzes patient data to determine if treatments or hospital stays are medically necessary.
It was designed to improve efficiency and reduce costs. However, a lawsuit filed in 2023 alleges that this model has significant flaws, leading to wrongful denials of care.
The AI model processes claims data and compares it to patterns in historical medical records. It aims to predict whether a patient’s care is necessary based on standardized criteria. The goal is to automate decisions, saving time for both the insurer and healthcare providers. Yet, the high error rate has raised serious concerns about its reliability.
The 90% Error Rate Allegation
A class-action lawsuit claims United Healthcare knowingly used an AI model with a 90% error rate to deny care. The lawsuit, filed in Minnesota, argues that the AI overrides doctors’ recommendations, leading to patients being denied necessary treatments.
This has particularly affected elderly patients under Medicare Advantage plans. The allegations suggest that the company prioritized cost-cutting over patient care.
The error rate refers to the percentage of cases where the AI incorrectly flags a treatment as unnecessary. For example, if a patient needs extended hospital care, the AI might deny it based on its algorithm, even if a doctor deems it essential. Such errors can lead to premature discharges or uncovered medical expenses. This has sparked outrage among patients and advocacy groups.
How Does the AI Model Work?
The nH Predict model uses machine learning to analyze vast amounts of data. It looks at patient histories, diagnoses, and treatment plans to make decisions. The system is trained on historical claims data to identify patterns. If a patient’s case doesn’t match these patterns, the AI may flag it for denial.
The model is supposed to work alongside human reviewers. However, the lawsuit claims that human oversight is often minimal. In some cases, staff were pressured to follow the AI’s recommendations, even when they conflicted with medical advice. This has led to accusations that United Healthcare prioritizes profits over patient well-being.
Impact on Patients
The high error rate of United Healthcare’s AI model has serious consequences for patients. Elderly patients, in particular, have been affected. Many have been forced to leave hospitals prematurely or pay out-of-pocket for care. This can lead to financial strain and worsening health conditions.
For example, a patient recovering from surgery might need extended care. If the AI denies this, they could be discharged too soon, risking complications. Families have reported emotional distress and confusion when care is denied. The lawsuit highlights stories of patients who suffered due to these decisions.
Why Does the Error Rate Matter?
A 90% error rate is alarming in any healthcare context. When AI makes incorrect decisions, it undermines trust in the system. Patients rely on insurers to cover necessary care, and doctors expect their recommendations to be respected. A flawed AI model disrupts this trust.
High error rates also raise questions about accountability. If an AI denies care, who is responsible for the outcome? The insurer, the AI developers, or the healthcare providers? These questions are at the heart of the ongoing lawsuit against United Healthcare.
Regulatory and Legal Responses
The controversy has drawn attention from lawmakers and regulators. In 2025, several states introduced bills to address AI use in healthcare. These laws focus on transparency and human oversight. For instance, some states require a physician to review AI-based decisions before denying care.
The federal government is also exploring AI regulations. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed rules in 2025 to ensure AI tools in healthcare are fair and accurate. These regulations aim to prevent insurers from relying solely on AI for critical decisions. The lawsuit against United Healthcare may push for stricter oversight.
Ethical Concerns with AI in Healthcare
Using AI in healthcare raises ethical questions. AI can improve efficiency, but it must prioritize patient safety. A model with a high error rate risks harming vulnerable populations, like the elderly or chronically ill. Ethical AI should be transparent, accurate, and accountable.
Another concern is the lack of human involvement. AI should support, not replace, medical professionals. If United Healthcare’s model overrides doctors’ judgments, it undermines the role of human expertise. This balance between technology and human judgment is critical.
Challenges in AI Development
Developing reliable AI for healthcare is complex. AI models need vast amounts of high-quality data to make accurate predictions. If the data is incomplete or biased, the model can produce errors. United Healthcare’s AI may have been trained on flawed or limited datasets.
Another challenge is overfitting, where an AI becomes too focused on specific patterns. This can make it less effective for new or unique cases. Advancements in computing power and data availability have helped, but errors persist. Fixing these issues requires ongoing testing and refinement.
United Healthcare’s Response
United Healthcare has defended its use of the nH Predict model. The company claims it is a tool to assist, not replace, human decision-making. They argue that the AI helps standardize care decisions and reduce costs. However, they have not directly addressed the 90% error rate claim.
The company also emphasizes that human reviewers are involved in the process. Yet, the lawsuit alleges that these reviewers often lack the authority to override the AI. United Healthcare is working to address public concerns, but the legal battle continues.
Comparison of AI Error Rates in Healthcare
Not all AI models in healthcare have high error rates. Some are highly accurate, especially in areas like medical imaging. The table below compares United Healthcare’s AI model to other healthcare AI applications.
| AI Application | Error Rate | Primary Use | Human Oversight |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Healthcare nH Predict | 90% (alleged) | Claims approval/denial | Limited |
| Medical Imaging AI | 5-10% | Diagnosing diseases from scans | High |
| Predictive Analytics for ICU | 15-20% | Patient monitoring | Moderate |
This table shows that United Healthcare’s AI has a significantly higher error rate than other applications. Medical imaging AI, for example, benefits from clearer data and stricter validation. This highlights the need for better standards in claims processing AI.
What Can Be Done to Improve AI Accuracy?
Improving AI accuracy requires several steps. First, companies must use high-quality, diverse datasets. This ensures the AI can handle a wide range of cases. Regular testing and updates are also essential to catch errors early.
Human oversight is critical. AI should never have the final say in healthcare decisions. Doctors and trained staff must review AI outputs, especially for denials. Transparency about how AI models work can also build trust with patients.
The Future of AI in Healthcare
AI has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, but it must be used responsibly. United Healthcare’s experience shows the risks of relying on flawed models. As technology improves, AI could become more accurate and reliable. However, this will take time and investment.
Regulators and insurers must work together to set clear standards. Patients deserve systems that prioritize their health over profits. The ongoing lawsuit may shape how AI is used in healthcare moving forward.
Patient Advocacy and Awareness
Patients can protect themselves by staying informed. If a claim is denied, they should ask if AI was involved. Appealing denials with help from doctors or advocacy groups can make a difference. Understanding insurance policies also empowers patients to fight for their rights.
Advocacy groups are pushing for stricter AI regulations. They want insurers to disclose when AI is used and ensure human oversight. These efforts aim to prevent future errors and protect vulnerable patients.
Lessons for the Healthcare Industry
The United Healthcare AI error rate controversy is a wake-up call. It shows the dangers of rushing AI into critical systems without proper testing. Other insurers and healthcare providers can learn from this. AI must be rigorously validated before use.
Collaboration between tech developers, insurers, and doctors is key. By working together, they can create AI that supports, rather than undermines, patient care. This balance will define the future of healthcare technology.
Summary
United Healthcare’s AI model, nH Predict, has been accused of having a 90% error rate in denying care, sparking a major lawsuit. This issue highlights the risks of using flawed AI in healthcare decisions.
Patients, especially the elderly, have faced wrongful denials, leading to financial and health challenges. Ethical concerns, limited human oversight, and poor data quality contribute to the problem.
Improving AI accuracy, ensuring human review, and increasing transparency are critical steps forward. The healthcare industry must learn from this to build trust and protect patients.
FAQ
What is the United Healthcare AI error rate issue?
A lawsuit claims United Healthcare’s AI model, nH Predict, has a 90% error rate in denying care. It allegedly overrides doctors’ recommendations, affecting patients’ access to treatment. This has raised concerns about patient safety and trust.
How does the AI model affect patients?
The AI may deny necessary treatments, forcing patients to pay out-of-pocket or leave care early. Elderly patients on Medicare Advantage plans are particularly impacted. This can lead to health complications and financial stress.
What is being done about the issue?
A class-action lawsuit is ongoing, and states are introducing laws for AI transparency. Federal regulators are also proposing rules to ensure AI fairness. These efforts aim to increase oversight and accountability.
Can patients fight AI-based denials?
Yes, patients can appeal denials with help from doctors or advocacy groups. Asking if AI was used in the decision can help. Understanding insurance policies is also key to advocating for coverage.
Sources